Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Alexandra Rogers

Urology Lafayette, CO Medical Doctor

NPI 1093954497 CMS profile 95147

300 Exempla Cir, Lafayette, CO 80026

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$476,188

465 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$200,000

4 holdings reported · through program year 2025

Research they led as principal investigator

$15,254 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2021–2022

Through program year 2025, Alexandra Rogers of Lafayette, CO is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $476,188 across 465 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $15,254 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them. They also declared ownership or investment interests valued at $200,000 across 4 holdings.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 99th percentile of Urology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

11 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $61,332 138
2024 General $103,790 94
2023 General $265,659 86
2022 General $15,291 32
2021 General $26,753 32
2020 General $975 23
2019 General $2,390 60
2025 Ownership $50,000 1
2024 Ownership $50,000 1
2023 Ownership $50,000 1
2022 Ownership $50,000 1

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Alexandra Rogers
  • Urology median
  • Middle half of Urology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Alexandra Rogers were reported at $61,332. Among 9,461 Urology profiles paid that year, the median was $629 and the middle half received between $190 and $1,620.

Show as a table
Year Alexandra Rogers Urology median Middle half National median
2019 $2,390 $480 $147–$1,201 $163
2020 $975 $246 $87–$645 $114
2021 $26,753 $358 $111–$1,000 $132
2022 $15,291 $476 $143–$1,263 $149
2023 $265,659 $560 $168–$1,461 $160
2024 $103,790 $563 $170–$1,464 $164
2025 $61,332 $629 $190–$1,620 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Valencia Technologies Corporation $323,380 49 payments
  2. Medtronic, Inc. $62,851 146 payments
  3. Sumitomo Pharma America, Inc. $40,429 63 payments
  4. Axonics Modulation Technologies, Inc. $22,619 79 payments
  5. Urovant Sciences Inc $22,555 25 payments
  6. Medtronic USA, Inc. $1,679 29 payments
  7. C. R. Bard, Inc. & Subsidiaries $393 3 payments
  8. Becton, Dickinson and Company $380 1 payment
  9. Allergan Inc. $210 8 payments
  10. Boston Scientific Corporation $202 5 payments
  11. Other $1,491 57 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Consulting Fee $348,346 42 payments
  2. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $80,344 46 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $37,337 138 payments
  4. Food and Beverage $9,182 232 payments
  5. Education $623 3 payments
  6. Honoraria $357 4 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. eCoin Device Kit $323,380 49 payments
  2. GEMTESA Urology $60,863 87 payments
  3. Axonics r-SNM System Urology $18,042 21 payments
  4. INTERSTIM Sacral Nerve Stimulation $11,604 31 payments
  5. ALTAVIVA $10,614 80 payments
  6. Axonics $3,266 44 payments
  7. Bulkamid $2,942 40 payments
  8. GEMTESA Urology $2,120 1 payment
  9. INTERSTIM Sacral Nerve Stimulation $1,636 28 payments
  10. Axonics r-SNM System Urology $538 4 payments
  11. Other $2,847 76 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 3 drugs

Part D claims

266

Median for Urology: 1,053

Drug cost

$229,409

Median for Urology: $101,464

Branded share of claims

76.7%

Median for Urology: 27.1%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Gemtesa Vibegron Brand 204 $226,049
Estradiol Generic 51 $3,317
Ciprofloxacin Hcl Generic 11 $43

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 10,221 Part D prescribers listed as Urology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 16 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$30,521

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

68

Average age 72

Services billed

495

68 women, 0 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 54%
Arthritis 50%
Depression 38%
Osteoporosis 26%
Ischemic heart disease 18%
Cancer 18%
Chronic kidney disease 16%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

2 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
GEMTESA
  • Sumitomo Pharma America, Inc. $22,686
$22,686 204 —
DAXXIFY
  • REVANCE THERAPEUTICS, INC. $37
$37 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

465 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Urology in Colorado

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record