Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Alexandra-Mary Kelada

Internal Medicine Roseville, CA Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1811429418 CMS profile 4223429

680 Sunrise Ave, Roseville, CA 95661

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$13,806

608 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Alexandra-Mary Kelada of Roseville, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $13,806 across 608 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 96th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,788 81
2024 General $2,002 96
2023 General $2,363 119
2022 General $2,894 158
2021 General $2,589 122
2020 General $478 28
2019 General $1,693 4

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Alexandra-Mary Kelada
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Alexandra-Mary Kelada were reported at $1,788. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Alexandra-Mary Kelada Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $1,693 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $478 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $2,589 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $2,894 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $2,363 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $2,002 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $1,788 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Celgene Corporation $1,589 3 payments
  2. AbbVie, Inc. $1,390 73 payments
  3. Novo Nordisk Inc $1,218 81 payments
  4. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $1,156 58 payments
  5. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $981 31 payments
  6. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $875 44 payments
  7. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $723 38 payments
  8. Lilly USA, LLC $658 36 payments
  9. Astellas Pharma US Inc $608 20 payments
  10. Pfizer Inc. $580 27 payments
  11. Other $4,028 197 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $11,913 598 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $1,550 1 payment
  3. Education $343 9 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Otezla $1,589 3 payments
  2. RYBELSUS $1,131 76 payments
  3. Ozempic $1,107 75 payments
  4. Kerendia $981 31 payments
  5. UBRELVY $680 37 payments
  6. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $611 35 payments
  7. SHINGRIX $433 22 payments
  8. BREZTRI $409 24 payments
  9. JARDIANCE $385 17 payments
  10. LINZESS $340 20 payments
  11. Other $10,069 488 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 127 drugs

Part D claims

6,472

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$797,873

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

19.9%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 106 $118,159
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 68 $110,019
Synjardy Xr Empagliflozin/Metformin Hcl Brand 52 $76,955
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 44 $66,703
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 34 $39,478
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 23 $33,148
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 15 $28,966
Rybelsus Semaglutide Brand 12 $28,925
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 30 $27,397
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 12 $27,147

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 127 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 59 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$165,294

Of which drugs: $8,903

Medicare patients

324

Average age 75

Services billed

2,558

241 women, 83 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 74%
Arthritis 54%
Depression 36%
Chronic kidney disease 34%
Ischemic heart disease 27%
Diabetes 24%
Osteoporosis 24%
Atrial fibrillation 20%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Sarscv2 vac 30mcg trs-suc im 91320 Office 21 22 $3,313
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90653 Office 40 40 $2,352

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 34 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
JARDIANCE
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $145
  • Lilly USA, LLC $36
$181 44 —
TRELEGY ELLIPTA
  • GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $156
$156 34 —
APRETUDE
  • ViiV Healthcare Company $114
$114 — —
Kerendia
  • Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $101
$101 — —
BREZTRI
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $85
$85 16 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 34 with Patron

Records

608 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in California

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record