Nurse Practitioner Program year 2023 Reported 2021–2023 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Alexandra Hobbs

Nurse Practitioner, Pediatrics Flowood, MS Nurse Practitioner

NPI 1982103198 CMS profile 10517819

2510 Lakeland Dr, Flowood, MS 39232

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$3,603

52 records reported · program years 2021–2023

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2021–2023

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2023, Alexandra Hobbs of Flowood, MS is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $3,603 across 52 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 97th percentile of Nurse Practitioner, Pediatrics profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

3 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2023 General $168 15
2022 General $2,682 22
2021 General $754 15

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Alexandra Hobbs
  • Nurse Practitioner, Pediatrics median
  • Middle half of Nurse Practitioner, Pediatrics
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Alexandra Hobbs were reported at $0. Among 7,458 Nurse Practitioner, Pediatrics profiles paid that year, the median was $93 and the middle half received between $35 and $201.

Show as a table
Year Alexandra Hobbs Nurse Practitioner, Pediatrics median Middle half National median
2019 $0 — — $163
2020 $0 — — $114
2021 $754 $60 $23–$142 $132
2022 $2,682 $72 $27–$161 $149
2023 $168 $89 $35–$185 $160
2024 $0 $93 $34–$199 $164
2025 $0 $93 $35–$201 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2021–2023
  1. Genzyme Corporation $2,744 8 payments
  2. Salix Pharmaceuticals, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $163 11 payments
  3. AbbVie, Inc. $157 4 payments
  4. Celgene Corporation $130 13 payments
  5. Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $127 3 payments
  6. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $80 1 payment
  7. QOL Medical, LLC $45 2 payments
  8. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $42 2 payments
  9. Pharmacosmos Therapeutics Inc. $31 2 payments
  10. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. $25 2 payments
  11. Other $59 4 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2021–2023
  1. Consulting Fee $2,629 4 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $974 48 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2021–2023
  1. DUPIXENT Immunology $2,721 7 payments
  2. DUPIXENT Inflammation And Immunology $206 4 payments
  3. HUMIRA $157 4 payments
  4. ZEPOSIA $130 13 payments
  5. XIFAXAN $126 8 payments
  6. Sucraid $45 2 payments
  7. DIFICID $42 2 payments
  8. TRULANCE $37 3 payments
  9. Monoferric $31 2 payments
  10. ENTYVIO $25 2 payments
  11. Other $59 4 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Records

52 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2023

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record