Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Alejandro Gil

Internal Medicine Los Angeles, CA Medical Doctor

NPI 1417951963 CMS profile 18646

240 N Virgil Ave Ste 7, Los Angeles, CA 90004

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$16,301

493 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Alejandro Gil of Los Angeles, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $16,301 across 493 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 96th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,243 48
2024 General $2,844 52
2023 General $2,793 74
2022 General $1,820 57
2021 General $1,964 90
2020 General $2,048 90
2019 General $2,589 82

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Alejandro Gil
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Alejandro Gil were reported at $2,243. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Alejandro Gil Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $2,589 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $2,048 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $1,964 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $1,820 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $2,793 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $2,844 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $2,243 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $1,566 34 payments
  2. AbbVie, Inc. $1,187 30 payments
  3. Amgen Inc. $1,117 17 payments
  4. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $1,067 19 payments
  5. Novo Nordisk Inc $976 48 payments
  6. Amarin Pharma Inc. $949 35 payments
  7. Avanir Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $906 51 payments
  8. Lilly USA, LLC $880 20 payments
  9. Allergan Inc. $875 30 payments
  10. Pfizer Inc. $713 30 payments
  11. Other $6,066 179 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $16,268 488 payments
  2. Education $27 4 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $7 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Kerendia $1,566 34 payments
  2. NUEDEXTA $906 51 payments
  3. XARELTO $834 17 payments
  4. VERQUVO $737 18 payments
  5. Ozempic $650 35 payments
  6. Vascepa $629 24 payments
  7. UBRELVY $628 10 payments
  8. ELIQUIS $578 24 payments
  9. RYBELSUS $577 31 payments
  10. Otezla $576 13 payments
  11. Other $13,044 422 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 187 drugs

Part D claims

10,317

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$1,862,020

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

27.1%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Flucytosine Generic 14 $322,229
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 164 $125,675
Kerendia Finerenone Brand 147 $125,249
Entresto Sacubitril/Valsartan Brand 167 $111,626
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 108 $88,576
Soliqua 100-33 Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Brand 98 $84,982
Linzess Linaclotide Brand 127 $80,691
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 60 $63,454
Vascepa Icosapent Ethyl Brand 105 $44,490
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 38 $43,924

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 187 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 105 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$247,084

Of which drugs: $1,462

Medicare patients

471

Average age 75

Services billed

7,055

281 women, 190 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 71%
Diabetes 54%
Chronic kidney disease 36%
Cancer 31%
Ischemic heart disease 30%
Heart failure 24%
Depression 24%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Influenza vaccine, trivalent derived from cell cultures 90661 Office 25 25 $903
Injection, methocarbamol, up to 10 ml J2800 Office 18 34 $166
Injection, ceftriaxone sodium, per 250 mg J0696 Office 46 198 $67
Infusion, normal saline solution , 1000 cc J7030 Office 15 20 $42
Injection, dexamethasone sodium phosphate, 1 mg J1100 Office 51 300 $25
Injection, vitamin b-12 cyanocobalamin, up to 1000 mcg J3420 Office 20 27 $24

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 28 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Kerendia
  • Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $317
$317 147 —
Otezla
  • Amgen Inc. $281
$281 — —
EVENITY
  • Amgen Inc. $248
$248 — —
JARDIANCE
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $132
  • Lilly USA, LLC $25
$157 164 —
REXULTI
  • Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Inc. $138
$138 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 28 with Patron

Records

493 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in California

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record