Who Paid My Doc
Albert Sun
Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology Durham, NC Medical Doctor
NPI 1285754408 CMS profile 712686
40 Duke Medicine Cir, Durham, NC 27710
General payments
$138,209
Research payments
$0
Ownership & investment interest
$0
Research they led as principal investigator
$31,456
Through program year 2025, Albert Sun of Durham, NC is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $138,209 across 305 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $31,456 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.
No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.
General payments for this record sit in the 91st percentile of Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.
By program year
7 rows| Year | Kind | Relative to this record's peak year | Amount | Records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | General | $13,105 | 38 | |
| 2024 | General | $12,916 | 47 | |
| 2023 | General | $5,741 | 35 | |
| 2022 | General | $17,569 | 49 | |
| 2021 | General | $12,717 | 13 | |
| 2020 | General | $37,742 | 20 | |
| 2019 | General | $38,419 | 103 |
Beside peers
- Albert Sun
- Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology median
- Middle half of Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology
- National median
In program year 2025, general payments to Albert Sun were reported at $13,105. Among 3,064 Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology profiles paid that year, the median was $2,462 and the middle half received between $733 and $7,710.
Show as a table
| Year | Albert Sun | Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology median | Middle half | National median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | $38,419 | $2,361 | $585–$8,260 | $163 |
| 2020 | $37,742 | $993 | $247–$4,351 | $114 |
| 2021 | $12,717 | $1,185 | $326–$4,739 | $132 |
| 2022 | $17,569 | $2,073 | $554–$6,789 | $149 |
| 2023 | $5,741 | $2,568 | $759–$8,159 | $160 |
| 2024 | $12,916 | $2,557 | $703–$7,403 | $164 |
| 2025 | $13,105 | $2,462 | $733–$7,710 | $169 |
Breakdown
A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.
Prescribing to Medicare patients
Part D · data year 2024 · 14 drugsPart D claims
558
Drug cost
$226,476
Branded share of claims
50.5%
| Drug | Type | Relative to their largest | Claims | Drug cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eliquis Apixaban | Brand | 124 | $152,066 | |
| Xarelto Rivaroxaban | Brand | 31 | $42,535 | |
| Multaq Dronedarone Hcl | Brand | 15 | $18,858 | |
| Ranolazine Er Ranolazine | Brand | 62 | $4,997 | |
| Mexiletine Hcl | Generic | 16 | $2,313 | |
| Metoprolol Succinate | Generic | 102 | $1,703 | |
| Amiodarone Hcl | Generic | 74 | $1,477 | |
| Flecainide Acetate | Generic | 29 | $860 | |
| Diltiazem 24hr Er (Cd) Diltiazem Hcl | Brand | 21 | $514 | |
| Verapamil Er Verapamil Hcl | Brand | 17 | $338 |
The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 14 counted.
Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 2,573 Part D prescribers listed as Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.
Billing to Medicare
Part B · data year 2024 · 46 billing codesPaid by Medicare
$65,316
Medicare patients
359
Services billed
796
| Condition among their Medicare patients | Relative to the most common | Share of patients |
|---|---|---|
| High blood pressure | 75% | |
| Atrial fibrillation | 67% | |
| Heart failure | 60% | |
| Ischemic heart disease | 55% | |
| Arthritis | 49% | |
| Chronic kidney disease | 39% | |
| Diabetes | 33% | |
| Depression | 22% |
Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.
Records
305 reportedEvery payment, record by record
Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.
Other Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology in North Carolina
Michael Manogue
Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology · Asheville, NC
Daniel Friedman
Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology · Durham, NC
James Allred
Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology · Greensboro, NC
John Rhyner
Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology · Asheville, NC
Gregory Harris
Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology · Greenville, NC
John Catanzaro
Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology · Greenville, NC
Related records
Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology in North Carolina
Practitioners in the same specialty and state, ranked by reported value.
All Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology
Everyone recorded under this specialty, nationwide.
Doctors in North Carolina
Every practitioner in the state with a reported payment.
How to read this page
What each amount means, and what it does not mean.
What this means
U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.
An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.
Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.