Physician Assistant Program year 2025 Reported 2021–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Albert Lundquist

Ophthalmology Greensboro, NC Physician Assistant

NPI 1295727634 CMS profile 194258

3312 Battleground Ave, Greensboro, NC 27410

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$2,181

82 records reported · program years 2021–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2021–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Albert Lundquist of Greensboro, NC is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $2,181 across 82 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 61st percentile of Ophthalmology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $475 16
2024 General $304 13
2023 General $464 18
2022 General $492 18
2021 General $445 17

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Albert Lundquist
  • Ophthalmology median
  • Middle half of Ophthalmology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Albert Lundquist were reported at $475. Among 13,034 Ophthalmology profiles paid that year, the median was $384 and the middle half received between $136 and $917.

Show as a table
Year Albert Lundquist Ophthalmology median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $258 $104–$655 $163
2020 $0 $126 $45–$321 $114
2021 $445 $205 $76–$534 $132
2022 $492 $266 $100–$678 $149
2023 $464 $308 $117–$745 $160
2024 $304 $340 $127–$846 $164
2025 $475 $384 $136–$917 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $472 21 payments
  2. Oyster Point Pharma, Inc. $385 12 payments
  3. Alcon Vision LLC $286 10 payments
  4. Allergan Inc. $167 5 payments
  5. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $163 8 payments
  6. Bausch & Lomb, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $149 7 payments
  7. Kala Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $143 2 payments
  8. Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $139 5 payments
  9. Bausch & Lomb Americas Inc. $137 6 payments
  10. Mallinckrodt Hospital Products Inc. $44 2 payments
  11. Other $96 4 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $2,181 82 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. TYRVAYA $362 11 payments
  2. LUMIGAN $348 15 payments
  3. LOTEMAX SM $168 8 payments
  4. PROLENSA $168 8 payments
  5. XIIDRA $163 8 payments
  6. VYZULTA $161 7 payments
  7. EYSUVIS $143 2 payments
  8. XDEMVY $139 5 payments
  9. TRYPTYR $132 2 payments
  10. VUITY $130 3 payments
  11. Other $999 47 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 19 drugs

Part D claims

634

Median for Ophthalmology: 891

Drug cost

$243,453

Median for Ophthalmology: $68,233

Branded share of claims

57.6%

Median for Ophthalmology: 29.7%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Restasis Cyclosporine Brand 116 $168,549
Lumigan Bimatoprost Brand 41 $16,715
Xiidra Lifitegrast Brand 14 $13,335
Cyclosporine Generic 21 $9,648
Rocklatan Netarsudil Mesylat/Latanoprost Brand 16 $9,442
Simbrinza Brinzolamide/Brimonidine Tart Brand 43 $9,123
Vyzulta Latanoprostene Bunod Brand 19 $7,437
Fluorometholone Generic 25 $2,644
Brimonidine Tartrate-Timolol Brimonidine Tartrate/Timolol Brand 19 $2,569
Prednisolone Acetate Generic 30 $1,304

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 19 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 18,260 Part D prescribers listed as Ophthalmology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 7 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
LUMIGAN
  • AbbVie, Inc. $96
$96 41 —
XDEMVY
  • Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $47
$47 — —
Rocklatan
  • Alcon Vision LLC $41
$41 16 —
ACTHAR
  • Mallinckrodt Hospital Products Inc. $27
$27 — —
MIEBO
  • Bausch & Lomb Americas Inc. $24
$24 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 7 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

82 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Ophthalmology in North Carolina

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record