Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Alan Olmstead

Dermatology Twin Falls, ID Medical Doctor

NPI 1306936794 CMS profile 1292593

844 Washington St N Ste 100, Twin Falls, ID 83301

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$404,550

730 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$21,386 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2022

Through program year 2025, Alan Olmstead of Twin Falls, ID is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $404,550 across 730 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $21,386 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 97th percentile of Dermatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $22,525 37
2024 General $54,623 99
2023 General $51,020 97
2022 General $72,635 127
2021 General $39,451 85
2020 General $31,791 58
2019 General $132,505 227

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Alan Olmstead
  • Dermatology median
  • Middle half of Dermatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Alan Olmstead were reported at $22,525. Among 10,363 Dermatology profiles paid that year, the median was $788 and the middle half received between $207 and $1,974.

Show as a table
Year Alan Olmstead Dermatology median Middle half National median
2019 $132,505 $454 $129–$1,240 $163
2020 $31,791 $235 $81–$756 $114
2021 $39,451 $377 $108–$1,108 $132
2022 $72,635 $514 $143–$1,391 $149
2023 $51,020 $607 $159–$1,674 $160
2024 $54,623 $751 $204–$1,903 $164
2025 $22,525 $788 $207–$1,974 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $331,715 558 payments
  2. Amgen Inc. $41,457 60 payments
  3. Celgene Corporation $15,635 24 payments
  4. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $14,431 24 payments
  5. UCB, Inc. $510 23 payments
  6. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Inc. $129 8 payments
  7. Pfizer Inc. $110 3 payments
  8. Lilly USA, LLC $105 6 payments
  9. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $80 6 payments
  10. Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC $72 2 payments
  11. Other $306 16 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $280,269 116 payments
  2. Travel and Lodging $106,138 286 payments
  3. Food and Beverage $11,776 316 payments
  4. Consulting Fee $6,293 2 payments
  5. Education $74 10 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. SKYRIZI Immunology $144,983 260 payments
  2. RINVOQ $123,562 176 payments
  3. HUMIRA $61,844 116 payments
  4. Otezla Inflammation $41,457 60 payments
  5. Otezla Dermatology $15,612 19 payments
  6. COSENTYX Dermatology $12,788 15 payments
  7. COSENTYX Immunology $1,469 6 payments
  8. Bimzelx $339 12 payments
  9. COSENTYX Dermatology $236 3 payments
  10. SKYRIZI Immunology $180 4 payments
  11. Other $1,095 55 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 26 drugs

Part D claims

834

Median for Dermatology: 534

Drug cost

$329,763

Median for Dermatology: $67,151

Branded share of claims

14.3%

Median for Dermatology: 8.1%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 25 $166,724
Rinvoq Upadacitinib Brand 22 $141,770
Clobetasol Propionate Generic 86 $4,136
Desonide Generic 33 $3,267
Minocycline Hcl Generic 37 $2,432
Triamcinolone Acetonide Generic 198 $1,863
Hydrocortisone Generic 51 $1,477
Valacyclovir Valacyclovir Hcl Brand 31 $1,469
Imiquimod Generic 50 $1,297
Metronidazole Generic 22 $1,187

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 26 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,550 Part D prescribers listed as Dermatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 44 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$96,240

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

637

Average age 77

Services billed

3,487

324 women, 313 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 63%
Arthritis 41%
Chronic kidney disease 21%
Diabetes 18%
Ischemic heart disease 17%
Atrial fibrillation 16%
Depression 15%
Cancer 14%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 13 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
RINVOQ
$39,938 22 —
SKYRIZI
$14,236 — —
Bimzelx
$164 — —
VTAMA
$71 — —
CIBINQO
$37 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 13 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

730 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Dermatology in Idaho

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record