Doctor of Podiatric Medicine Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Alan Boehm

Podiatrist Raleigh, NC Doctor of Podiatric Medicine

NPI 1851303366 CMS profile 265105

1418 E Millbrook Rd, Raleigh, NC 27609

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$8,249

194 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$23,989 paid to institutions, not to them · program year 2024

Through program year 2025, Alan Boehm of Raleigh, NC is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $8,249 across 194 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $23,989 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 90th percentile of Podiatrist profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,457 46
2024 General $1,041 32
2023 General $2,148 38
2022 General $763 17
2021 General $481 9
2020 General $927 13
2019 General $1,433 39

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Alan Boehm
  • Podiatrist median
  • Middle half of Podiatrist
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Alan Boehm were reported at $1,457. Among 4,572 Podiatrist profiles paid that year, the median was $260 and the middle half received between $94 and $777.

Show as a table
Year Alan Boehm Podiatrist median Middle half National median
2019 $1,433 $196 $72–$601 $163
2020 $927 $118 $38–$335 $114
2021 $481 $169 $57–$573 $132
2022 $763 $220 $74–$782 $149
2023 $2,148 $208 $71–$635 $160
2024 $1,041 $237 $87–$681 $164
2025 $1,457 $260 $94–$777 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. ConvaTec Inc. $1,030 28 payments
  2. Epsfl, LLC $935 4 payments
  3. Musculoskeletal Transplant Foundation Inc. $532 5 payments
  4. Henry Schein, Inc. $500 1 payment
  5. Horizon Therapeutics plc $380 19 payments
  6. Ortho Dermatologics, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $351 6 payments
  7. Smith+Nephew, Inc. $334 15 payments
  8. Paratek Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $293 13 payments
  9. Organogenesis Inc. $273 5 payments
  10. Medline Industries, Inc. $225 4 payments
  11. Other $3,398 94 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $7,722 192 payments
  2. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $500 1 payment
  3. Entertainment $28 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. INNOVAMATRIX AC $895 22 payments
  2. JUBLIA $351 6 payments
  3. NUZYRA $293 13 payments
  4. Qutenza $199 7 payments
  5. TheraGenesis Wound Matrix $196 4 payments
  6. NAFTIN $187 2 payments
  7. Licart $181 9 payments
  8. Tirosint $181 9 payments
  9. KRYSTEXXA Krystexxa $174 6 payments
  10. KRYSTEXXA Inflammation/Rare Disease $174 10 payments
  11. Other $5,114 149 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 7 drugs

Part D claims

338

Median for Podiatry: 160

Drug cost

$19,159

Median for Podiatry: $2,368

Branded share of claims

24.9%

Median for Podiatry: 12.7%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Jublia Efinaconazole Brand 18 $14,352
Ciclopirox Generic 141 $3,674
Amoxicillin-Clavulanate Potass Amoxicillin/Potassium Clav Brand 66 $571
Methylprednisolone Generic 48 $217
Doxycycline Hyclate Generic 20 $138
Terbinafine Hcl Generic 13 $130
Meloxicam Generic 32 $77

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 14,093 Part D prescribers listed as Podiatry; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 38 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$256,074

Of which drugs: $85,934

Medicare patients

486

Average age 75

Services billed

1,549

292 women, 194 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 70%
Arthritis 55%
Diabetes 27%
Ischemic heart disease 24%
Osteoporosis 22%
Chronic kidney disease 21%
Atrial fibrillation 20%
Depression 20%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, betamethasone acetate 3 mg and betamethasone sodium phosphate 3 mg J0702 Office 24 31 $169

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 6 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
KRYSTEXXA
  • Amgen Inc. $53
$53 — —
Tirosint
  • IBSA Pharma Inc. $35
$35 — —
Licart
  • IBSA Pharma Inc. $35
$35 — —
NUZYRA
  • Paratek Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $29
$29 — —
JUBLIA
  • Ortho Dermatologics, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $16
$16 18 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 6 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

194 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Podiatrist in North Carolina

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record