Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Agadadash Kuliev

Internal Medicine Houston, TX Medical Doctor

NPI 1215912365 CMS profile 145275

1140 Business Center Dr, Suite 203, Houston, TX 77043

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$3,051

150 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$19,813

Paid to them · 4 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$1,305,589 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2025

Through program year 2025, Agadadash Kuliev of Houston, TX is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $3,051 across 150 general payments and $19,813 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $1,305,589 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 97th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

9 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $588 27
2024 General $458 23
2024 Research $6,418 2
2023 General $671 31
2022 General $665 29
2021 General $285 17
2020 General $116 8
2020 Research $13,395 2
2019 General $269 15

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Agadadash Kuliev
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Agadadash Kuliev were reported at $588. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Agadadash Kuliev Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $269 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $116 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $285 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $665 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $671 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $458 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $588 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Novo Nordisk Inc $706 30 payments
  2. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $433 24 payments
  3. Pfizer Inc. $325 15 payments
  4. Lilly USA, LLC $321 16 payments
  5. Abbott Laboratories $156 7 payments
  6. Exact Sciences Corporation $145 6 payments
  7. Amgen Inc. $124 7 payments
  8. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $103 7 payments
  9. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $84 4 payments
  10. Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Inc. $62 3 payments
  11. Other $591 31 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $3,051 150 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Ozempic $519 28 payments
  2. RYBELSUS $489 26 payments
  3. FARXIGA $359 20 payments
  4. PREVNAR 20 $194 8 payments
  5. MOUNJARO $181 8 payments
  6. ABRYSVO $153 6 payments
  7. Cologuard Collection Kit $145 6 payments
  8. COMIRNATY $127 5 payments
  9. Kerendia $103 7 payments
  10. JARDIANCE $84 4 payments
  11. Other $1,527 82 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Novo Nordisk AS $13,395 2 payments
  2. Eli Lilly and Company $6,418 2 payments

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 179 drugs

Part D claims

11,959

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$1,460,257

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

22.2%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 218 $396,927
Xigduo Xr Dapaglifloz Propaned/Metformin Brand 97 $127,041
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 63 $114,423
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 72 $101,435
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 61 $78,442
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 52 $70,772
Creon Lipase/Protease/Amylase Brand 23 $68,907
Synjardy Xr Empagliflozin/Metformin Hcl Brand 47 $56,481
Rybelsus Semaglutide Brand 16 $36,619
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 23 $28,074

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 179 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 32 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$177,221

Of which drugs: $11,418

Medicare patients

791

Average age 77

Services billed

3,675

454 women, 337 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 50%
Ischemic heart disease 32%
Diabetes 24%
Osteoporosis 24%
Depression 23%
Chronic kidney disease 22%
Atrial fibrillation 21%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90653 Office 137 137 $11,209
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 1 mg J1010 Office 23 940 $91

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 13 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Kerendia
  • Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $41
$41 — —
ABRYSVO
  • PFIZER INC. $39
$39 — —
FARXIGA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $33
$33 61 —
MOUNJARO
  • Lilly USA, LLC $24
$24 18 —
RYBELSUS
  • Novo Nordisk Inc $23
$23 16 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 13 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

154 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in Texas

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record