Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Adam Zweig

Internal Medicine San Diego, CA Medical Doctor

NPI 1265527600 CMS profile 239120

3580 5Th Ave, San Diego, CA 92103

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$420,693

1,120 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Adam Zweig of San Diego, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $420,693 across 1,120 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 99th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $68,749 155
2024 General $97,348 193
2023 General $85,420 164
2022 General $53,281 131
2021 General $32,925 152
2020 General $27,328 111
2019 General $55,641 214

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Adam Zweig
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Adam Zweig were reported at $68,749. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Adam Zweig Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $55,641 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $27,328 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $32,925 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $53,281 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $85,420 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $97,348 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $68,749 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. ViiV Healthcare Company $319,874 545 payments
  2. Gilead Sciences, Inc. $58,885 270 payments
  3. EMD Serono, Inc. $29,159 57 payments
  4. Janssen Products, LP $5,780 10 payments
  5. Theratechnologies Inc. $3,317 30 payments
  6. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $1,543 147 payments
  7. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $1,043 10 payments
  8. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $565 26 payments
  9. Pfizer Inc. $121 6 payments
  10. Napo Pharmaceuticals Inc $119 7 payments
  11. Other $287 12 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $333,507 129 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $36,425 12 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $26,305 139 payments
  4. Food and Beverage $24,014 834 payments
  5. Education $442 6 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. APRETUDE Hiv $94,835 118 payments
  2. DOVATO $82,602 180 payments
  3. CABENUVA Hiv $74,810 109 payments
  4. Biktarvy $32,246 47 payments
  5. Serostim $28,734 30 payments
  6. CABENUVA Hiv $24,525 28 payments
  7. APRETUDE Hiv $12,266 13 payments
  8. SYMTUZA $7,338 157 payments
  9. JULUCA $3,948 10 payments
  10. TROGARZO $1,317 28 payments
  11. Other $3,595 147 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 100 drugs

Part D claims

3,897

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$3,844,361

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

40.8%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Serostim Somatropin Brand 64 $1,228,680
Biktarvy Bictegrav/Emtricit/Tenofov Ala Brand 184 $717,527
Dovato Dolutegravir Sodium/Lamivudine Brand 157 $444,572
Descovy Emtricitabine/Tenofov Alafenam Brand 160 $333,235
Egrifta Sv Tesamorelin Acetate Brand 36 $292,154
Tivicay Dolutegravir Sodium Brand 90 $196,920
Prezcobix Darunavir/Cobicistat Brand 53 $119,143
Odefsey Emtricitab/Rilpiviri/Tenof Ala Brand 29 $104,232
Cabenuva Cabotegravir/Rilpivirine Brand 16 $98,609
Triumeq Abacavir/Dolutegravir/Lamivudi Brand 18 $62,402

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 100 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 20 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$29,425

Of which drugs: $5,175

Medicare patients

88

Average age 65

Services billed

717

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 51%
Arthritis 32%
Depression 31%
Diabetes 23%
Ischemic heart disease 19%
Chronic kidney disease 16%
COPD 13%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Sarscov2 vac 50 mcg/0.5ml im 91322 Office 21 21 $3,327
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90653 Office 15 15 $823
Influenza vaccine, trivalent derived from cell cultures 90661 Office 12 12 $433

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 11 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
APRETUDE
$48,912 — —
CABENUVA
$18,968 16 —
Serostim
$12,511 64 —
Biktarvy
$10,610 184 —
DOVATO
$462 157 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 11 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

1,120 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in California

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record