Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Adam Weinfeld

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Austin, TX Medical Doctor

NPI 1346363280 CMS profile 743461

1400 N Ih 35, Ste 320, Austin, TX 78701

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$19,606

78 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$6,529

Paid to them · 2 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$15,308 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2021–2022

Through program year 2025, Adam Weinfeld of Austin, TX is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $19,606 across 78 general payments and $6,529 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $15,308 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 91st percentile of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

8 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $634 8
2024 General $3,733 26
2023 General $651 7
2022 General $847 9
2021 General $1,554 9
2020 General $6,603 9
2020 Research $6,529 2
2019 General $5,585 10

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Adam Weinfeld
  • Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery median
  • Middle half of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Adam Weinfeld were reported at $634. Among 2,070 Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery profiles paid that year, the median was $442 and the middle half received between $150 and $1,242.

Show as a table
Year Adam Weinfeld Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery median Middle half National median
2019 $5,585 $335 $121–$1,264 $163
2020 $6,603 $162 $57–$417 $114
2021 $1,554 $245 $89–$735 $132
2022 $847 $325 $120–$932 $149
2023 $651 $343 $129–$999 $160
2024 $3,733 $390 $141–$1,085 $164
2025 $634 $442 $150–$1,242 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Aziyo Biologics, Inc. $12,535 15 payments
  2. Motiva USA, LLC $2,591 9 payments
  3. AbbVie, Inc. $1,254 20 payments
  4. Allergan Inc. $799 7 payments
  5. AxoGen $691 7 payments
  6. TELA Bio, Inc. $377 3 payments
  7. Sientra, Inc. $275 3 payments
  8. Merz North America, Inc. $232 4 payments
  9. Mentor Worldwide LLC $212 3 payments
  10. Galderma Laboratories, L.P. $200 2 payments
  11. Other $442 5 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Consulting Fee $13,356 15 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $5,035 58 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $1,215 5 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. SimpliDerm ,Integuply $6,431 6 payments
  2. SimpliDerm $5,316 8 payments
  3. Motiva Implant Matrix Plastic Surgery $2,308 6 payments
  4. NATRELLE SALINE-FILLED BREAST IMPLANTS Plastic Surgery $1,020 15 payments
  5. Avance Nerve Graft $571 6 payments
  6. NATRELLE SALINE-FILLED BREAST IMPLANTS Plastics $483 3 payments
  7. OviTex 2S $377 3 payments
  8. ALLODERM $316 3 payments
  9. Motiva Implant Matrix Devices $283 3 payments
  10. SIENTRA HIGH STRENGTH COHESIVE SILICONE GEL BREAST IMPLANT $275 3 payments
  11. Other $1,744 20 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Aziyo Biologics, Inc. $6,529 2 payments

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 3 drugs

Part D claims

57

Median for Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: 61

Drug cost

$160

Median for Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: $369

Branded share of claims

0%

Median for Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: 30%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Oxycodone Hcl Generic 35 $90
Ondansetron Hcl Generic 11 $53
Gabapentin Generic 11 $17

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 2,638 Part D prescribers listed as Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 36 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$34,103

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

32

Average age 71

Services billed

116

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
Cancer 69%
Arthritis 50%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

2 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
BOTOX
  • AbbVie, Inc. $37
$37 — —
Zoryve
  • Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc. $24
$24 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

80 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery in Texas

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record