Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Adam Stys

Interventional Cardiology Sioux Falls, SD Medical Doctor

NPI 1083656821 CMS profile 321629

1305 W 18Th St, Sioux Falls, SD 57105

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$7,345

307 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$147,551 paid to institutions, not to them · program year 2024

Through program year 2025, Adam Stys of Sioux Falls, SD is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $7,345 across 307 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $147,551 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 49th percentile of Interventional Cardiology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $975 55
2024 General $509 26
2023 General $904 30
2022 General $513 38
2021 General $1,021 58
2020 General $816 28
2019 General $2,606 72

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Adam Stys
  • Interventional Cardiology median
  • Middle half of Interventional Cardiology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Adam Stys were reported at $975. Among 6,173 Interventional Cardiology profiles paid that year, the median was $1,092 and the middle half received between $366 and $3,019.

Show as a table
Year Adam Stys Interventional Cardiology median Middle half National median
2019 $2,606 $1,097 $329–$3,048 $163
2020 $816 $473 $161–$1,480 $114
2021 $1,021 $677 $233–$1,827 $132
2022 $513 $978 $333–$2,724 $149
2023 $904 $1,136 $382–$2,986 $160
2024 $509 $1,181 $395–$3,326 $164
2025 $975 $1,092 $366–$3,019 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Abbott Laboratories $2,134 28 payments
  2. Medtronic, Inc. $1,030 44 payments
  3. Abiomed $903 19 payments
  4. Acist Medical Systems, Inc. $546 3 payments
  5. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $473 59 payments
  6. ZOLL Services LLC (A/K/A ZOLL LifeCor Corp) $401 35 payments
  7. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $298 24 payments
  8. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $240 17 payments
  9. Medtronic Vascular, Inc. $156 5 payments
  10. Edwards Lifesciences Corporation $144 14 payments
  11. Other $1,020 59 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $6,233 303 payments
  2. Travel and Lodging $1,090 3 payments
  3. Education $22 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Xience V coronary stent system $1,112 4 payments
  2. Impella $772 14 payments
  3. COREVALVE EVOLUT R $582 30 payments
  4. XARELTO $473 59 payments
  5. LifeVest $401 35 payments
  6. HD-IVUS $340 1 payment
  7. CardioMEMS HF System $250 3 payments
  8. CVI SYSTEMS $207 2 payments
  9. CoreValve Evolut $197 9 payments
  10. Xience Sierra Coronary Stent System $190 2 payments
  11. Other $2,770 151 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 46 drugs

Part D claims

6,525

Median for Interventional Cardiology: 2,236

Drug cost

$1,317,656

Median for Interventional Cardiology: $380,412

Branded share of claims

37.3%

Median for Interventional Cardiology: 27.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 815 $719,161
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 391 $328,287
Repatha Sureclick Evolocumab Brand 98 $60,796
Praluent Pen Alirocumab Brand 68 $34,017
Brilinta Ticagrelor Brand 60 $32,078
Entresto Sacubitril/Valsartan Brand 28 $28,489
Multaq Dronedarone Hcl Brand 15 $14,119
Metoprolol Succinate Generic 992 $11,748
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 17 $11,149
Ranolazine Er Ranolazine Brand 70 $9,306

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 46 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 4,694 Part D prescribers listed as Interventional Cardiology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 79 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$560,076

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

3,192

Average age 75

Services billed

10,158

1,578 women, 1,614 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Ischemic heart disease 57%
Arthritis 47%
Atrial fibrillation 40%
Heart failure 36%
Diabetes 33%
Chronic kidney disease 33%
Depression 24%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

2 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
INJECTAFER
  • Daiichi Sankyo Inc. $20
$20 — —
ELIQUIS
  • E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $13
$13 815 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

307 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record