Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Adam Slansky

Neurology Maitland, FL Medical Doctor

NPI 1285876169 CMS profile 1336678

301 N. Maitland Ave, Maitland, FL 32751

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$111,779

1,550 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$15,375 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2022–2025

Through program year 2025, Adam Slansky of Maitland, FL is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $111,779 across 1,550 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $15,375 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 93rd percentile of Neurology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $5,743 284
2024 General $4,853 268
2023 General $4,676 209
2022 General $15,478 179
2021 General $25,985 218
2020 General $43,618 204
2019 General $11,427 188

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Adam Slansky
  • Neurology median
  • Middle half of Neurology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Adam Slansky were reported at $5,743. Among 11,022 Neurology profiles paid that year, the median was $457 and the middle half received between $118 and $2,344.

Show as a table
Year Adam Slansky Neurology median Middle half National median
2019 $11,427 $474 $118–$2,177 $163
2020 $43,618 $367 $82–$2,309 $114
2021 $25,985 $438 $104–$2,547 $132
2022 $15,478 $442 $103–$2,388 $149
2023 $4,676 $464 $119–$2,312 $160
2024 $4,853 $468 $119–$2,323 $164
2025 $5,743 $457 $118–$2,344 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. $30,660 89 payments
  2. Lilly USA, LLC $27,786 138 payments
  3. Allergan Inc. $17,290 69 payments
  4. AbbVie, Inc. $13,611 167 payments
  5. Jazz Pharmaceuticals Inc. $2,756 28 payments
  6. Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. $2,722 149 payments
  7. Genzyme Corporation $1,168 57 payments
  8. Biogen, Inc. $1,131 61 payments
  9. UCB, Inc. $1,096 49 payments
  10. Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $1,060 39 payments
  11. Other $12,499 704 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $77,599 80 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $26,099 1,423 payments
  3. Consulting Fee $6,300 7 payments
  4. Travel and Lodging $1,720 36 payments
  5. Education $60 4 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AJOVY Central Nervous System $24,783 34 payments
  2. UBRELVY Neuroscience $13,976 113 payments
  3. EMGALITY $13,734 57 payments
  4. UBRELVY Neuroscience $13,056 37 payments
  5. REYVOW $10,186 30 payments
  6. Ajovy Central Nervous System $5,207 16 payments
  7. QULIPTA $4,639 109 payments
  8. INGREZZA $2,622 143 payments
  9. XYWAV $2,146 16 payments
  10. Ongentys $1,009 66 payments
  11. Other $21,303 1,155 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 33 drugs

Part D claims

1,397

Median for Neurology: 833

Drug cost

$187,888

Median for Neurology: $202,670

Branded share of claims

30.4%

Median for Neurology: 25.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Zelapar Selegiline Hcl Brand 13 $72,834
Emgality Pen Galcanezumab-Gnlm Brand 54 $42,210
Qulipta Atogepant Brand 24 $26,065
Aimovig Autoinjector Erenumab-Aooe Brand 14 $10,152
Emgality Syringe Galcanezumab-Gnlm Brand 11 $7,374
Gabapentin Generic 256 $4,851
Carbidopa-Levodopa Carbidopa/Levodopa Brand 126 $2,795
Levetiracetam Generic 104 $2,630
Memantine Hcl Generic 59 $2,501
Propranolol Hcl Er Propranolol Hcl Brand 94 $2,236

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 33 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,695 Part D prescribers listed as Neurology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 48 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$395,227

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

788

Average age 75

Services billed

6,411

437 women, 351 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 57%
Ischemic heart disease 44%
Diabetes 34%
Depression 33%
Chronic kidney disease 29%
Atrial fibrillation 24%
Cancer 20%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 49 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
INGREZZA
$890 — —
QULIPTA
$247 24 —
UBRELVY
$230 — —
REXULTI
$210 — —
ULTOMIRIS
$169 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 49 with Patron

Records

1,550 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Neurology in Florida

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record