Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2020–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Adam Siwek

Interventional Pain Medicine Phoenix, AZ Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1770074007 CMS profile 5341430

20333 N 19Th Ave Ste 100, Phoenix, AZ 85027

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$13,813

172 records reported · program years 2020–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2020–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Adam Siwek of Phoenix, AZ is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $13,813 across 172 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 80th percentile of Interventional Pain Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,198 51
2024 General $8,175 92
2023 General $1,035 26
2022 General $3,364 2
2020 General $41 1

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Adam Siwek
  • Interventional Pain Medicine median
  • Middle half of Interventional Pain Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Adam Siwek were reported at $1,198. Among 1,891 Interventional Pain Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $657 and the middle half received between $184 and $1,753.

Show as a table
Year Adam Siwek Interventional Pain Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $684 $216–$2,079 $163
2020 $41 $382 $122–$1,109 $114
2021 $0 $552 $167–$1,554 $132
2022 $3,364 $605 $187–$1,924 $149
2023 $1,035 $671 $195–$1,915 $160
2024 $8,175 $684 $206–$1,837 $164
2025 $1,198 $657 $184–$1,753 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2020–2025
  1. Abbott Laboratories $7,199 101 payments
  2. Medtronic, Inc. $4,049 7 payments
  3. Spinal Simplicity, LLC $919 7 payments
  4. BIOTRONIK NRO, Inc. $310 16 payments
  5. Relievant Medsystems, Inc. $285 4 payments
  6. Boston Scientific Corporation $218 6 payments
  7. TerSera Therapeutics LLC $176 4 payments
  8. AbbVie, Inc. $145 6 payments
  9. IBSA Pharma Inc. $86 4 payments
  10. Curonix LLC $80 1 payment
  11. Other $344 16 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2020–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $5,351 151 payments
  2. Travel and Lodging $5,129 20 payments
  3. Grant $3,333 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2020–2025
  1. PROCLAIM $4,906 38 payments
  2. SYNCHROMEDII $3,589 5 payments
  3. ETERNA $1,123 24 payments
  4. HA MINUTEMAN G3-R $919 7 payments
  5. INTELLIS ADAPTIVESTIM $460 2 payments
  6. LIBERTY SI $353 2 payments
  7. Intracept Pain $327 6 payments
  8. Intracept Pain $285 4 payments
  9. Intracept Pain $285 4 payments
  10. Intracept Pain $285 4 payments
  11. Other $2,456 94 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 24 drugs

Part D claims

2,232

Median for Pain Management: 951

Drug cost

$45,755

Median for Pain Management: $26,034

Branded share of claims

32.4%

Median for Pain Management: 29.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Oxycodone-Acetaminophen Oxycodone Hcl/Acetaminophen Brand 377 $10,517
Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen Brand 234 $6,680
Xtampza Er Oxycodone Myristate Brand 22 $6,345
Gabapentin Generic 252 $3,550
Oxycodone Hcl Generic 173 $2,447
Pregabalin Generic 107 $2,433
Morphine Sulfate Er Morphine Sulfate Brand 79 $1,630
Cyclobenzaprine Hcl Generic 116 $1,588
Methocarbamol Generic 87 $1,374
Tizanidine Hcl Generic 114 $1,279

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 24 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 2,732 Part D prescribers listed as Pain Management; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 72 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$252,945

Of which drugs: $3,312

Medicare patients

395

Average age 73

Services billed

7,023

243 women, 152 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 75%
Depression 32%
Diabetes 29%
Ischemic heart disease 25%
Chronic kidney disease 24%
COPD 20%
Osteoporosis 19%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 84 884 $678
Injection, dexamethasone sodium phosphate, 1 mg J1100 Office 200 2,649 $236

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 9 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Prialt
  • TerSera Therapeutics LLC $158
$158 — —
BOTOX
  • AbbVie, Inc. $67
$67 — —
ROXYBOND
  • PROTEGA PHARMACEUTIALS LLC $34
$34 — —
XTAMPZA
  • Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc. $31
$31 22 —
QULIPTA
  • AbbVie, Inc. $18
$18 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 9 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

172 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record