Who Paid My Doc
Adam Falchook
Neurology Stuart, FL Medical Doctor
NPI 1780773465 CMS profile 955101
1111 Se Indian St Ste 102, Stuart, FL 34997
General payments
$292
Research payments
$0
Ownership & investment interest
$0
Research they led as principal investigator
$7,284,710
Through program year 2025, Adam Falchook of Stuart, FL is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $292 across 13 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $7,284,710 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.
No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.
General payments for this record sit in the 28th percentile of Neurology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.
By program year
4 rows| Year | Kind | Relative to this record's peak year | Amount | Records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | General | $80 | 1 | |
| 2021 | General | $64 | 4 | |
| 2020 | General | $89 | 4 | |
| 2019 | General | $59 | 4 |
Beside peers
- Adam Falchook
- Neurology median
- Middle half of Neurology
- National median
In program year 2025, general payments to Adam Falchook were reported at $80. Among 11,022 Neurology profiles paid that year, the median was $457 and the middle half received between $118 and $2,344.
Show as a table
| Year | Adam Falchook | Neurology median | Middle half | National median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | $59 | $474 | $118–$2,177 | $163 |
| 2020 | $89 | $367 | $82–$2,309 | $114 |
| 2021 | $64 | $438 | $104–$2,547 | $132 |
| 2022 | $0 | $442 | $103–$2,388 | $149 |
| 2023 | $0 | $464 | $119–$2,312 | $160 |
| 2024 | $0 | $468 | $119–$2,323 | $164 |
| 2025 | $80 | $457 | $118–$2,344 | $169 |
Breakdown
A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.
Prescribing to Medicare patients
Part D · data year 2024 · 1 drugPart D claims
15
Drug cost
$23
Branded share of claims
0%
| Drug | Type | Relative to their largest | Claims | Drug cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lorazepam | Generic | 15 | $23 |
Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 10,755 Part D prescribers listed as Psychiatry & Neurology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.
Records
13 reportedEvery payment, record by record
Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.
Other Neurology in Florida
Related records
Neurology in Florida
Practitioners in the same specialty and state, ranked by reported value.
All Neurology
Everyone recorded under this specialty, nationwide.
Doctors in Florida
Every practitioner in the state with a reported payment.
How to read this page
What each amount means, and what it does not mean.
What this means
U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.
An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.
Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.