Manufacturer or GPO Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

OsteoCentric Technologies, Inc.

TX, United States

CMS manufacturer 100000136547

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$1,569,293

3,726 payments

Research payments

$0

0 payments

Ownership & investment interest

$49,533,164

149 holdings by physicians or their families

Through program year 2025, OsteoCentric Technologies, Inc. reported paying $1,569,293 in general payments and $0 in research payments to U.S. physicians, teaching hospitals and other recipients.

No combined total These are different kinds of money, reported under different rules. A meal and a clinical trial grant do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 General $377,168 817
2024 General $303,360 917
2023 General $267,683 638
2022 General $254,616 562
2021 General $171,570 259
2020 General $82,519 258
2019 General $112,378 275

Breakdown

Top recipients General payments · program year 2025
  1. Peter Millett Sports Medicine · Vail, CO $39,000 1 payment
  2. Michael Weaver Orthopaedic Surgery · Boston, MA $28,510 12 payments
  3. Raymond Smith Orthopaedic Trauma · Worcester, MA $28,510 12 payments
  4. Mitchel Harris Orthopaedic Surgery · Boston, MA $28,510 12 payments
  5. Peter Moy Dentist, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery · Los Angeles, CA $21,345 17 payments
  6. Charles Schlesinger Dentist, General Practice · Albuquerque, NM $12,884 17 payments
  7. Mark Exler Dentist, Prosthodontics · Encino, CA $11,905 12 payments
  8. Anand Veeravagu Neurological Surgery · Palo Alto, CA $11,477 14 payments
  9. Brian Goh Orthopaedic Surgery of the Spine · Atlanta, GA $11,053 15 payments
  10. Kade Huntsman Orthopaedic Surgery of the Spine · Salt Lake City, UT $10,265 15 payments
Products the payments named General payments · program year 2025
  1. OsteoCentric 4.0 x 130mm LOCKING BONE SCREW FASTENER ST Not Applicable $377,168 100% · 259 recipients

Each share is of this company’s general payments naming a product in 2025. A payment can name up to five products, so these amounts overlap.

Specialties paid General payments · program year 2025
  1. Orthopaedic Surgery $134,908 36% · 110 practitioners
  2. Orthopaedic Trauma Orthopaedic Surgery $67,191 18% · 43 practitioners
  3. Sports Medicine Orthopaedic Surgery $44,218 12% · 11 practitioners
  4. Neurological Surgery $34,813 9% · 18 practitioners
  5. Orthopaedic Surgery of the Spine Orthopaedic Surgery $34,226 9% · 24 practitioners

The top 5 of 25 specialties; each share is of this company’s general payments to practitioners with a specialty in 2025. Each practitioner is counted under their primary specialty.

The top 25 specialties, free in the app

Where the money went General payments · program year 2025
  1. Massachusetts $100,144 27% · 8 recipients
  2. California $72,507 19% · 36 recipients
  3. Colorado $40,456 11% · 6 recipients
  4. Florida $23,119 6% · 21 recipients
  5. Minnesota $18,390 5% · 7 recipients

The top 5 of 36 states; each share is of this company’s general payments in 2025 where a state was reported.

The top 25 states, free in the app

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Consulting Fee $684,530 357 payments
  2. Royalty or License $371,553 593 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $329,971 525 payments
  4. Food and Beverage $183,238 2,251 payments
3,726 general

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

What you are looking at

Manufacturers of drugs, devices and biologicals, and group purchasing organisations, are required to report the payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. This page shows what this company reported.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record