Manufacturer or GPO Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

Natus Medical Incorporated

WI, United States

CMS manufacturer 100000806836

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$156,561

310 payments

Research payments

$0

0 payments

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Natus Medical Incorporated reported paying $156,561 in general payments and $0 in research payments to U.S. physicians, teaching hospitals and other recipients.

No combined total These are different kinds of money, reported under different rules. A meal and a clinical trial grant do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 General $13,514 11
2024 General $59,541 11
2023 General $37,458 27
2022 General $13,377 21
2021 General $20,747 80
2020 General $7,354 49
2019 General $4,570 111

Breakdown

Top recipients General payments · program year 2025
  1. Chelsea Shugars Neurology · Chattanooga, TN $6,821 1 payment
  2. Jeffrey Strakowski Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation · Columbus, OH $3,600 1 payment
  3. Andrew John Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation · San Francisco, CA $1,892 1 payment
  4. Lawrence Hirsch Neurology · New York, NY $500 1 payment
  5. Birgit Frauscher Neurology · Durham, NC $500 1 payment
  6. Stephen Katzen Neurological Surgery · Dallas, TX $48 1 payment
  7. George Schwartze Neuromusculoskeletal Medicine & OMM · Waco, TX $36 1 payment
  8. Jose Soto Neurological Surgery · Waco, TX $36 1 payment
  9. Noah Newton Physician Assistant, Medical · Waco, TX $36 1 payment
  10. James Fry Neurology with Special Qualifications in Child Neurology · Nashville, TN $30 1 payment
Specialties paid General payments · program year 2025
  1. Neurology Psychiatry & Neurology $7,821 58% · 3 practitioners
  2. Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation $5,492 41% · 2 practitioners
  3. Neurological Surgery $83 <1% · 2 practitioners
  4. Physician Assistant, Medical Physician Assistant $36 <1% · 1 practitioner
  5. Neuromusculoskeletal Medicine & OMM $36 <1% · 1 practitioner

The top 5 of 7 specialties; each share is of this company’s general payments to practitioners with a specialty in 2025. Each practitioner is counted under their primary specialty.

The top 25 specialties, free in the app

Where the money went General payments · program year 2025
  1. Tennessee $6,851 51% · 2 recipients
  2. Ohio $3,600 27% · 1 recipient
  3. California $1,892 14% · 1 recipient
  4. North Carolina $500 4% · 1 recipient
  5. New York $500 4% · 1 recipient

The top 5 of 7 states; each share is of this company’s general payments in 2025 where a state was reported.

The top 25 states, free in the app

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Honoraria $96,435 76 payments
  2. Compensation for serving as faculty or as a speaker for a medical education program $50,000 2 payments
  3. Food and Beverage $8,581 229 payments
  4. Consulting Fee $1,007 2 payments
  5. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $537 1 payment
310 general

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

What you are looking at

Manufacturers of drugs, devices and biologicals, and group purchasing organisations, are required to report the payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. This page shows what this company reported.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record