Manufacturer or GPO Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

Ebr Systems, Inc.

CA, United States

CMS manufacturer 100001451998

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$241,541

342 payments

Research payments

$0

0 payments

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Ebr Systems, Inc. reported paying $241,541 in general payments and $0 in research payments to U.S. physicians, teaching hospitals and other recipients.

No combined total These are different kinds of money, reported under different rules. A meal and a clinical trial grant do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

By program year

1 row
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 General $241,541 342

Breakdown

Top recipients General payments · program year 2025
  1. Spencer Kubo Cardiovascular Disease · Saint Paul, MN $133,700 12 payments
  2. Robert Canby Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology · Austin, TX $46,805 29 payments
  3. Niraj Varma Cardiovascular Disease · Maywood, IL $11,045 7 payments
  4. Emma Hegwood Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology · Ann Arbor, MI $2,750 1 payment
  5. James Ip Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology · New York, NY $2,499 10 payments
  6. Daniel Morin Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology · San Francisco, CA $2,193 14 payments
  7. Devi Nair Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology · Jonesboro, AR $2,079 14 payments
  8. George Thomas Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology · New York, NY $1,699 9 payments
  9. Michael Riley Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology · Marietta, GA $1,399 13 payments
  10. Keith Suarez Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology · San Antonio, TX $1,331 2 payments
Products the payments named General payments · program year 2025
  1. Wise CRT System Implantable Pacemaker $191,343 100% · 7 recipients

Each share is of this company’s general payments naming a product in 2025. A payment can name up to five products, so these amounts overlap.

Specialties paid General payments · program year 2025
  1. Cardiovascular Disease Internal Medicine $148,177 61% · 21 practitioners
  2. Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology Internal Medicine $83,426 35% · 83 practitioners
  3. Nurse Practitioner, Adult Health Nurse Practitioner $1,684 <1% · 11 practitioners
  4. Interventional Cardiology Internal Medicine $1,504 <1% · 8 practitioners
  5. Internal Medicine $1,289 <1% · 5 practitioners

The top 5 of 22 specialties; each share is of this company’s general payments to practitioners with a specialty in 2025. Each practitioner is counted under their primary specialty.

The top 25 specialties, free in the app

Where the money went General payments · program year 2025
  1. Minnesota $133,700 55% · 1 recipient
  2. Texas $53,922 22% · 33 recipients
  3. New York $14,486 6% · 51 recipients
  4. Illinois $11,574 5% · 3 recipients
  5. California $6,631 3% · 18 recipients

The top 5 of 25 states; each share is of this company’s general payments in 2025 where a state was reported.

The top 25 states, free in the app

What the payments were for General payments · program year 2025
  1. Consulting Fee $188,712 24 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $35,768 279 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $17,061 39 payments
342 general

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

What you are looking at

Manufacturers of drugs, devices and biologicals, and group purchasing organisations, are required to report the payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. This page shows what this company reported.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record