Manufacturer or GPO Program year 2019 Source: CMS Open Payments

Braemar Manufacturing, LLC

CA, United States

CMS manufacturer 100000571814

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$317,644

847 payments

Research payments

$0

0 payments

Ownership & investment interest

$16,344

1 holding by physicians or their families

Through program year 2019, Braemar Manufacturing, LLC reported paying $317,644 in general payments and $0 in research payments to U.S. physicians, teaching hospitals and other recipients.

No combined total These are different kinds of money, reported under different rules. A meal and a clinical trial grant do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

By program year

1 row
Year Kind Amount Payments
2019 General $317,644 847

Breakdown

Top recipients General payments · program year 2019
  1. Eric Prystowsky Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology · Indianapolis, IN $130,012 2 payments
  2. Peter Kowey Cardiovascular Disease · Wynnewood, PA $66,000 1 payment
  3. Byron Lee Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology · Palo Alto, CA $33,000 1 payment
  4. Nicholas Skipitaris Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology · New York, NY $20,000 1 payment
  5. Robert Fishel Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology · Atlantis, FL $10,026 2 payments
  6. Kevin Floyd Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology · Worcester, MA $6,925 1 payment
  7. Alexander Chernobelsky Cardiovascular Disease · Wellington, FL $4,800 1 payment
  8. Daniel Miller Vascular Neurology · Detroit, MI $2,717 2 payments
  9. Jane Chen Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology · Minneapolis, MN $2,000 1 payment
  10. Judith MacKall Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology · Cleveland, OH $2,000 1 payment
Products the payments named General payments · program year 2019
  1. Cardiac Monitoring Suite Cardiology $317,644 100% · 844 recipients

Each share is of this company’s general payments naming a product in 2019. A payment can name up to five products, so these amounts overlap.

Specialties paid General payments · program year 2019
  1. Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology Internal Medicine $210,757 66% · 81 practitioners
  2. Cardiovascular Disease Internal Medicine $88,989 28% · 414 practitioners
  3. Interventional Cardiology Internal Medicine $6,686 2% · 156 practitioners
  4. Vascular Neurology Psychiatry & Neurology $2,863 <1% · 3 practitioners
  5. Pediatric Cardiology Pediatrics $2,734 <1% · 28 practitioners

The top 5 of 35 specialties; each share is of this company’s general payments to practitioners with a specialty in 2019. Each practitioner is counted under their primary specialty.

The top 25 specialties, free in the app

Where the money went General payments · program year 2019
  1. Indiana $130,182 41% · 9 recipients
  2. Pennsylvania $66,893 21% · 43 recipients
  3. California $42,172 13% · 113 recipients
  4. New York $22,789 7% · 61 recipients
  5. Florida $20,589 6% · 117 recipients

The top 5 of 40 states; each share is of this company’s general payments in 2019 where a state was reported.

The top 25 states, free in the app

What the payments were for General payments · program year 2019
  1. Consulting Fee $263,800 6 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $35,625 833 payments
  3. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $18,220 8 payments
847 general

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

What you are looking at

Manufacturers of drugs, devices and biologicals, and group purchasing organisations, are required to report the payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. This page shows what this company reported.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2019

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record