Manufacturer or GPO Program year 2019 Source: CMS Open Payments

Auris Health, Inc.

CA, United States

CMS manufacturer 100000226828

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$100,275

186 payments

Research payments

$71,137

15 payments

Ownership & investment interest

$96,112,496

7 holdings by physicians or their families

Through program year 2019, Auris Health, Inc. reported paying $100,275 in general payments and $71,137 in research payments to U.S. physicians, teaching hospitals and other recipients.

No combined total These are different kinds of money, reported under different rules. A meal and a clinical trial grant do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

By program year

2 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2019 General $100,275 186
2019 Research $71,137 15

Breakdown

Top recipients General payments · program year 2019
  1. Alexander Chen Pulmonary Disease · Saint Louis, MO $13,144 2 payments
  2. Jaime Landman Urology · Orange, CA $10,654 3 payments
  3. Christopher Manley Pulmonary Disease · Philadelphia, PA $9,737 6 payments
  4. Amit Mahajan Internal Medicine · Falls Church, VA $7,391 6 payments
  5. Sandeep Khandhar Thoracic Surgery (Cardiothoracic Vascular Surgery) · Fairfax, VA $7,323 3 payments
  6. Brian Eisner Urology · Boston, MA $6,343 4 payments
  7. Stephen Kovacs Pulmonary Disease · Erie, PA $6,099 3 payments
  8. Juan Escalon Surgery · Orlando, FL $5,203 4 payments
  9. Roger Sur Urology · San Diego, CA $4,000 2 payments
  10. Douglas Hogarth Pulmonary Disease · Chicago, IL $3,460 6 payments
Top research recipients Research payments · program year 2019
  1. Washington University $36,599 4 payments
  2. Cleveland Clinic Hospital Teaching hospital · OH $16,750 2 payments
  3. Henry Ford Hospital Teaching hospital · MI $12,125 3 payments
  4. Medical University of South Carolina $2,875 4 payments
  5. El Camino Hospital $2,788 2 payments
Products the payments named General payments · program year 2019
  1. Monarch Robotic Surgery $100,275 100% · 90 recipients

Each share is of this company’s general payments naming a product in 2019. A payment can name up to five products, so these amounts overlap.

Specialties paid General payments · program year 2019
  1. Pulmonary Disease Internal Medicine $43,626 44% · 51 practitioners
  2. Urology $29,823 30% · 8 practitioners
  3. Thoracic Surgery (Cardiothoracic Vascular Surgery) $8,701 9% · 11 practitioners
  4. Surgery $8,131 8% · 4 practitioners
  5. Internal Medicine $7,702 8% · 3 practitioners

The top 5 of 11 specialties; each share is of this company’s general payments to practitioners with a specialty in 2019. Each practitioner is counted under their primary specialty.

The top 25 specialties, free in the app

Where the money went General payments · program year 2019
  1. California $26,017 26% · 15 recipients
  2. Pennsylvania $16,245 16% · 7 recipients
  3. Virginia $14,789 15% · 3 recipients
  4. Missouri $13,289 13% · 2 recipients
  5. Massachusetts $6,442 6% · 3 recipients

The top 5 of 25 states; each share is of this company’s general payments in 2019 where a state was reported.

The top 25 states, free in the app

What the payments were for General payments · program year 2019
  1. Consulting Fee $75,060 31 payments
  2. Travel and Lodging $16,188 22 payments
  3. Food and Beverage $9,026 133 payments
186 general · 15 research

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

What you are looking at

Manufacturers of drugs, devices and biologicals, and group purchasing organisations, are required to report the payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. This page shows what this company reported.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2019

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record